Right to Recall (conditional and unconditional withdraw support)

Series on "Participative Democracy", "Technical Democracy", "Direct Democracy", "My Democracy My Decisions"

Right to Recall is the most important right after fundamental rights means I should be able to withdraw support to my member of parliament like collision parties does when ruling social servant party (rather they become political parties) does not listen to them, simple!

This is most democratic and effective way to make Member of Parliament listen to public voice in 2100 technical century.

It has many virtues -
It is completely constitutional
It is completely social
It is completely democratic

Unconditional Support Withdrawal (simple format to start with)
0. Precondition is to have mobile phone voting technology.
1. Any person or group can request to Rajyapal to exercise motion of support for his member of parliament.
2. As soon as votes reach 1 lakh, Rajyapal issues a notice for the public votes to be casted within 10 days.
3. People cast their votes through the use of mobile phone voting technology.
4. if 10 lakh people voted to withdraw support then member of parliament is recalled.
5. Then we reelect another member based on new manifesto.

Unconditional Support Withdrawal (refined format to start with)
0. Precondition is to have mobile phone voting technology.
0. Precondition is to have Sensex like Live Candidate Index System (people oriented approach)
1. Any number of people can register themselves as candidate for membership of parliament.
2. People have only one active vote to cast in favor of any candidate.
3. Candidates has ranking based on the no of support votes.
4. Top candidate at last date of the month is automatically Member of Parliament for next one month.

Conditional Support Withdrawal (enhanced format to start with)
0. Precondition is to have mobile phone voting technology.
0. Precondition is to have Sensex like Live Topic Index System (people agnostic approach)

Public can issue a conditional support withdrawn like social servant parties issue whip to its member of parliament to vote as per the wish of social servant party president.
Any person, group can raise its demands and campaign for them. If public favor the agenda they will support it and vote for it, this system answers and resolves the question whether mass public does support the cause or not.

It works like this,
1.
say Anna Hazare group wants to bring or amend Lokpaql Bill, their team produces one set of Lokpal Bill.
(It is debated publicly in media and on roads etc..., public is literate and can debate for its own democracy in 2100 technical century, we do not want to outsource my participation to the member of parliament, that was 1900 century)
2.
Group registers its agenda as parliament question or parliament public notification or whatever process we may device. This entry is given a number and is available to be voted by public, directly and if 1 crore people votes to pick the bill then bill is considered to be picked up to make a law.
3.
Now the Bill produced by the group will not be agreed by many people so after step 2 when bill is marked to be made law then different groups can register their alternate bills. People will vote for multiple bills as a gesture of cooperation (one person can vote for more than one bill) and all the bills having more than 1 crore votes will be available to be voted to make one final law.
4.
Now parliament can debate the agenda (point of debate is to express one’s point of view) and then people will vote to choose only one bill using mobile phone voting technology (one person one vote) to make it final. Than Member of Parliament will oblige the people wish and do the paperwork to enforce the final bill.
5.
Members fail to vote in favor, in spite of public direct verdict (like president is obliged to follow parliament) will lost their membership of parliament, effective immediately after voting. 

Member of Ministry instead of Parliament (advanced format to start with)
precondition
Mobile phone voting technology (to enable people voting)
Live Candidate index or System (to keep place competitive for worthy candidates as for one topic people may choose one person to implement and for another topic people may choose another person, most win-win situation, best person selection for topic wise)
Live Topic index System (to priorities and debate the topic to be implemented)

Member of ministry is a group of ministers, people leading individual ministries. this is not a status quo group but to co operate with other on overlapping areas.
1.
people will enlist themselves to be interested to lead a given ministry (one general minister for day to day work or it can be IAS officer also and others are project wise minister or lead)
2.

people will vote for each ministry individually (or project) to select their person to lead that area like environment, nanotechnology, finance, urban development etc..
3. 
If popularity or ranking sinks then other replacing person leads on.

Mobile Phone Voting Technology
A.
Each and every person in country who is literate like Rajya Sabha members will be issued an permanent mobile telephone no (unique mobile id)
B.
Later on, each and every person will be issued a permanent unique email id through which copy of all official communication will begin to happen also.

Live Candidate Index System
A.
Each person has only one vote to cast
B.
Each person can change his support from current person to another person or become neutral also, at any time but once in a day.
C.
Live Candidate System records the change of votes and recalculates the ranking based on the votes of favor each candidate has.

so simple, it is 2100 century and it is now time to have technical  democracy.

 (It is not 1900 century that we need someone to send in parliament on our behalf to choose our destiny
At that time we send people in parliament because one reason - in time of emergencies we need a group to handle the situation promptly, second reason - parliament does not have that much space, fourth reason - technology was not present at that time)

(We need parliament only for day to day work and not to make or amend laws that better is done by public directly. By defining the laws directly the master guides the servants how to work, so it is master role to define the laws not of the servants)

Thank You,
Chukked

P.S.

Era of Technical Democracy involves three systems -

1. Mobile phone voting technology.
2. Sensex like Live Public Topic Index System (people agnostic approach)
3. Sensex like Live Candidate Index System (people oriented approach)
4. Must not have a party/ corporate system
5. This is an era of repid productivity, i work 12 hours a day and 6 days of week, my boss is at my head all the day. my leader gave me an environment where i work, work and work so why i can not expect them to work rapidly on govt side, but my work i  myself have to do so let us begin the era of "my democracy my decisions".
6. I know they have concentrated all the economic development to the couple of cities to force me to buy their 600 sq. ft. 2bhk for 40+ lakh and sold myself upfront for next 20 years, my almost all life at the age of 30.